The Weekly Guide to Employment Law Developments

The Rocky Mountain Employer

Labor & Employment Law Updates

Employers Given Space to Make Appropriate Business Judgments

A federal appeals court has held that a plaintiff claiming intentional workplace discrimination must prove her employer treated her worse than co-workers outside her protected class who were similar to her “in all material respects.”

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
DOL Proposes Increased Salary Level for White-Collar Overtime Exemptions

The United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) plans to increase the salary threshold for so-called “white collar overtime exemptions,” from $455 per week ($23,660 per year) to $679 per week ($35,308 per year), and to increase the annual compensation requirement for a separate class of “highly compensated employees” from $100,000 to $147,414 per year.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Lactation-Based Bias is Both Sex Discrimination and Harassment

A restaurant franchisee must pay $1.5 million to a female employee for denying her a private place to express breast milk, under a recent Delaware jury award.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Colorado Employers Could Face Varying Minimum Wage Rates Under Proposed Bill

The Democrat-controlled Colorado General Assembly has introduced a bill that would allow cities to set their own minimum wages. Colorado law currently prohibits municipalities from setting minimum wages higher than the state rate (currently  $11.10 an hour, with an increase to $12.00 an hour in 2020).

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Employers Protected From Age-Based Bias Claims Brought by Job Applicants

A federal appeals court has ruled that outside job applicants may not sue companies under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) for neutral hiring practices that have a negative impact on older applicants.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Colorado's “Equal Pay for Equal Work” Bill Moves Forward

A bill that would (1) prohibit Colorado employers from considering a job applicant’s past salary history when determining her pay rate, (2) require employers to post jobs openings (and the wage rate for such job openings) to all employees, and (3) allow employees to recover up to three years of back pay for unequal pay, plus liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees, is moving forward in the Colorado Senate.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Employers May Be Held Liable for Workplace Sex Gossip

A federal appeals court has held that false rumors about a female employee sleeping with her male boss for a promotion can subject an employer to liability under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”).

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Colorado’s “Ban the Box” Legislation Is Gaining Momentum

The Colorado General Assembly is considering a “ban the box” bill that would prohibit employers from inquiring about applicants’ criminal histories in initial applications, and prohibit advertisements stating those with criminal histories may not apply. The underlying policy for this legislation, which several states have enacted, is to reduce the number of otherwise qualified individuals from not applying for gainful employment because of criminal issues in their past.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
NLRB Gives Companies and Workers Leeway to Operate Under Independent Contractor Model

The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has re-instated its traditional independent contractor test, acknowledging that many franchisees and freelance contractors have significant opportunities for both economic gain and loss, and therefore should be treated as small businesses.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Employees’ Failure to Report Harassment May Not Prevent Employer Liability

In the wake of heightened focus on sexual harassment in the workplace, employers may find it more difficult to have even weak harassment cases dismissed before trial. This proved to be the case in Minarsky v. Susquehanna County, where a federal appeals court ruled that an employee’s failure to utilize her employer’s harassment reporting procedures was reasonable and did not prevent the employer from potentially being liable for years’-long harassment.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Supreme Court Expected to Provide Clarity on Exhaustion of Remedies Requirement

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider whether federal courts have the power to review claims brought under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”) if the plaintiff did not first file a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or an equivalent state agency.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Supreme Court Delivers Another Victory for Arbitration Agreements

In a unanimous opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court held this week that where an agreement gives an arbitrator authority to decide what disputes must be arbitrated, courts may not refuse to send a case to arbitration even if it is clear from the terms of the contract that the request to arbitrate is “wholly groundless.”

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Colorado’s 2019 Legislative Session Expected to Bring a Slew of Workplace Bills

Colorado’s 2019 Legislative Session begins January 4, 2019, and, with a new Democratic governor and the Democratic party controlling both chambers of the General Assembly, we expect to see the introduction of numerous workplace and arbitration related bills with potentially far-reaching, and onerous, effects on employers. The following bills, which failed in previous years, likely will be the focus of serious debate between now and late May 2019, when the legislative session is scheduled to end:

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Private Employers Impacted by Partial Government Shutdown

The partial government shutdown, which began December 22, 2018 and has caused hundreds of thousands of federal workers to stop working or work without pay, has begun to affect private employers who are not government contractors, and employees of such companies, in the following ways:

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Minimum Wages Set to Increase in Twenty-One States

As we approach the end of the year, employers should be aware that minimum wages are set to increase in twenty-one states in 2019.  The following table, which supplements The Rocky Mountain Employer’s post earlier this year, sets forth the upcoming 2019 increases in minimum wages and tipped employee minimum wages.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Unauthorized Copying of Co-Worker Personnel Files to Support Discrimination Claim Is Not Protected Conduct

An employer did not violate federal law by firing an employee for copying confidential coworker personnel files in an effort to support her discrimination claim, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled. The court in Netter v. Barnes rejected the plaintiff’s argument that stealing confidential personnel files for the purpose of proving a discrimination claim is protected conduct under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”).

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Professor’s Claim That Public Union Violates Her Free Speech Rights Rejected by Federal Courts

This week, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the denial of a preliminary injunction in a case challenging the legality of public sector unions.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Employees May Bring Title VII Failure-to-Accommodate Claims Based on Religion Only When They Have Suffered an Adverse Employment Action

Plaintiffs bringing failure-to-accommodate claims under the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) based on religion must prove they suffered an adverse employment action such as a termination, demotion, or decrease in pay, under a recent federal district court case in Colorado.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Campbell Litigation Wishes You a Happy Thanksgiving

Campbell Litigation and the Rocky Mountain Employer wish you a happy and safe Thanksgiving. We will resume postings next Thursday, November 29, 2018.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF
Kentucky Companies May Not Condition Employment on Agreement to Arbitrate

The Kentucky Supreme Court has ruled that employers in that state may not require employees to sign an employment arbitration agreement as a condition of employment, as such a condition violates state law.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF